The following are a set of notes resulting from a Seed Project conversation and subsequent elaboration around ideas of leadership in the context of Emerging Leader Labs--and by extension the larger contexts of "old" and "new" cultural paradigms we would seek to bridge.
Premise: Old-style leadership is a command-and-control affair. Rigid formal structure, concentrated authority, thorough constraint by protocol, clear punishment/reward systems, narrow focus of agenda and objective, addressed toward problems/threats, characterized by conflict, fond of sacrifice.
Inquiry: Can we go beyond compromise, to reach coherence? A greater transpersonal whole which demands no subjugation from its constituents--save that of the possessive identity/ego complex?
Generative Paradox: What does it mean to lead from a place of surrender?
response-ability: capacity for adaptation and creative response to changing conditions. Being present, aware, affirmative and engaging, leading with confi-dance as an enthusiastic improv artist
What does a leader "look like" - on paper, and in action?
dimensions of accomplishment - how do we demonstrate and communicate merit?
qualitative vibrance / charisma - stories of effective performance
capacity for invitation - how ably are people / assets enlisted?
nurturing the common vision - evocative stewardship
commitment to feasibility - there is a way!!
commitment to play - it's going to be fun!!
deference and distributiveness
decisiveness + sophistication
peace in motion / dance
clear statements
axes of facilitation / attention:
assertive vs. receptive
imagination vs. analysis
holistic vs. specific
permission v. consensus
variance v. coherence
agility vs. persistence
What are the "anti-patterns" - corrosive personal / cultural inheritances to acknowledge and release?
low-capacity reductive/reactive conversation
structural bias toward hierarchies
myth of "objectivity"
problem "solving" orientation
rigid contractual agreement
comfort zoning
homogeneity of substrate
discreet/linear/lcd accounting
Game the Shift!
We begin as individuals within organizations who agree to agile "phase change" reactions and experimentation, learning and monitoring as we develop systemic awareness as a social organism, at which (theoretical/idealized!!) point "leadership" becomes moot and all assets, all intentions, all degrees of freedom are synchronously inter-actualized.